Security system is said to be one of the most vital aspects in doing business

Security system is said to be one of the most vital aspects in doing business and ensuring the interest of the comp whatever and the welfare of all the employees. Thus, the warranter personnel are in military commission of guarding and protecting the companys resources and its people. As for the case of Walter, a security guard in Bug, it is considerable that he has pull a wrongdoing against the company and to his duty, as one of the security personnel that is responsible of guarding the companys business.As a security guard for Bug, Walters primary duty is to protect the interest of the business and defend the companys property against the probable pass on subversion coming from external forces. Thus, knowing the fact that Steve is working for Wiretap, Walter should have not freed Steve and let him paseo away from Bug, as if nothing happened and he has not possibly gathered vital information closely Bugs nature of doing business.Under the tort law, Walter has committed an offe nse, which is that of breach of duty, as he conciously let Steve to walk away disrespect of the fact that he has made an offense in tresspassing the private domain of the company. Hence, Walter could be held liable to any harm and damages that might happen to Bug, as a result of successful subversion of Steve to the companys premises.More so, Walter could be held accountable to any probable lost in the company because of being negligent and disregarding level orders, which is that of protecting and ensuring the companys resources and confidentiality in doing business. The tort law, on the dissimilar hand, is considered to be different as oppose to other areas of law because it is only a branch of civil law. Unlike in criminal law, wherein the plaintiff is unceasingly regarded as the state and the defendant, the dispute in tort law is only between two different private parties.More so, in tort law, the punishment for unsuccesfull defendant is only a matter of paying and shoulde ring for the damages of the plaintiff, which evidently different as oppose to other areas of law wherein the defendant is usually punished by the state incase of proven guilty of committing a crime. Reference Theories of tort Law. (2003). Retrieved June 12, 2009, from http//plato. stanford. edu/entries/tort-theories/ Larson, A. (2003). Negligence and Tort Law. Retrieved June 12, 2009, from http//www. expertlaw. com/ subroutine library/personal_injury/negligence. html